#126 ~ Mansfield Park Revisited

November 28, 2008 at 2:26 pm | Posted in Books, Historical Fiction, Reading | 8 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Mansfield Park Revisited: A Jane Austen Entertainment by Joan Aiken

I first read Mansfield Park in my early 20s.  A co-worker let me borrow her copy.  It was my introduction to Jane Austen and, perhaps as a result, it has always been my favorite Austen novel.  Although I’m not much of one for sequels to significant novels when they are not written by the original author (don’t even get me started on what’s happened to Gone With the Wind…), the thought of heading back to Mansfield sounded very pleasant.  I was hoping it would prompt me to re-read Austen’s classic.  Unfortunately that didn’t happen, but I was quickly reacquainted with Mansfield Park and its inhabitants and neighbors through Aiken’s Mansfield Park Revisited.

This novel picks up with Susan Price, Fanny’s sister, living with Lady Bertram and her cousin Tom.  Tom, as the oldest son, has recently become the Lord of Mansfield Park after the unexpected demise of his father.  Edmund and Fanny, married with two children, live at the Parsonage.  Maria Bertram, disgraced after leaving her husband for Henry Crawford, a man who abruptly showed her the door, is not discussed.  Julia, who made an equally impulsive and regrettable match, has two unruly sons and is constantly at Mansfield Park conniving to make a match between her sister-in-law and the new Sir Thomas.  Lady Bertram, who mourns her husband only as much as is required, has even less interest in her children now than she did before they lived with her.  The story gets started when, after Edmund and Fanny leave to tie up lose business ends for the late Lord Bertram in Antigua, an extremely ill Mary Crawford returns to rent the White House in hopes of improving her health.  Her arrival raises what would be considered an uproar in an otherwise sleepy Mansfield Park.

At just 201 pages, Mansfield Park Revisited is not a lengthy novel, but there were portions that felt long.  This can be attributed to a rather tame story line and the amount of inner dialog that could have been better conveyed through action.  Julia and her sister-in-law Charlotte could have made a winning foils if only they did something other than gossip or complain.  Susan equally could have been a stronger character had her struggles been more difficult to overcome.  Lady Bertram also would have been more fun had she a little of her old bite back.  When a hair covering lent to Susan by Mary did nothing to create drama, I started praying that Maria would come back to spice things up a little.  This would have been a better novel had the author spent more time on the Roman excavation picnic and all that transpired afterward.  The story line would have been better suited for a shorter novella.

Although it was not what I had hoped, it was a relaxing read. I would compare it to fan fiction, so the subtitle “A Jane Austen Entertainment” fits it very well.  As the novel became more engaging toward the end and I found the conclusion satisfying, I would recommend this to other Jane Austen fans who like having something around the house or in your purse to read off and on as the mood strikes.


To buy this novel, click here.


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. I usually don’t like sequels when they’re not written by the original author, either.

  2. I’ve never read the original Mansfield Park, but I’ve seen the BBC version of the novel. I hope I don’t have to read the original before reading this one in my TBR pile.
    You can definitely read this without having read Mansfield Park. If that’s what you end up doing, I’ll be really interested to get your take on this book.

  3. This book is in my TBR pile, and I’m looking forward to reading it, even though I wasn’t crazy about Mansfield Park. I’m a bit disappointed to hear that Maria isn’t in the story.
    What was it about Mansfield Park that didn’t catch you? Where did it fall in your reading of Jane Austen? I often find that the first novel I read by an author tends to be my favorite for some reason. Sorry, I hadn’t thought about Maria not being in the novel as a spoiler! It was unintentional. I try not to do that!

  4. Like Serena, I’ve never read Mansfield Park. It’s interesting that it’s your favorite Austen novel, Jennifer.

    This type of book seems to be a strong trend right now.

  5. Love the term “fan fiction.” Excellent description!

  6. I have not read an Austen novel to date. I don’t know what’s wrong with me! I’ve seen several of the movies and I know I would love them.

  7. I find Mansfield Park the least engaging of Austen’s novels, so I was really surprised when the sequel came out.

    Gone With The Wind sequels…shudder…
    bybee, I’d really be interested in why you didn’t like Mansfield Park as much (please see my previous responses). I wonder if I’d still feel the same way if I reread all of Austen’s novels and saved Mansfield Park for last? That could be an interesting experiment.

  8. Hmm, here’s another case of recycled cover art (although I have no idea which was published first). My copy of “Cassandra and Jane” (review and cover pic here) had a different angle of the same picture. I wonder what the original picture is from?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.

%d bloggers like this: